Human Reality

Evolution at its simplest: A man and a woman get together and make a baby and the baby is half like the man and half like the woman. Thus, the people that have kids are the people who will be represented in the next generation. Those that don't won't. If only tall men and women have kids, the next generation will be taller than the last. If only stupid or lazy people have kids, the next generation will be lazier and less intelligent. Over many generations, groups of people will change based on who has kids and who doesn't. 

A group of people, living for tens of thousands of years in a northern land where there are harsh winters that last for many months, will have to save food during the summer and fall to survive the winter. They would need people who know how to save up resources and plan for the future. If you were a man, then and there, you would want to marry a woman whose family was good at planning and saving, so your kids with her would also be good at planning and saving. And when your kids grow older and want to marry, you'd want them to marry people who are also good at planning and saving, so your grandkids would be good at it too. This would help you survive and help your descendants survive generation after generation. Anyone who couldn't plan and save for the future would be someone dangerous to live around, and thus you wouldn't want them around you or your family, nor would you want your family to become like them. 

A group of people living for tens of thousands of years in a place where summer and winter are the same, and there is an abundance of plants and animals to eat all year round, will never need to save up for later. Just hunt or pick fruit when you're hungry and don't when you're not. In this environment, you don't need to look for special skills in the person you make babies with. All you need to do is make babies. So, in this environment, who makes the babies? The person who has the most sex. The horniest. They do not have to make sure their kids are able to survive a harsh winter, they just need to make as many babies as they can and hope some of those babies survive to make babies themselves.

With this all said, it's easy to tell how the races became different. Different places in the world require different abilities and plans of survival. For the ancient Europeans, it was to survive harsh winters. For the ancient Africans, it was to make the most babies. 

From the year 1000 AD to 1750 AD, western European countries like England, France and Germany executed criminals constantly. Every generation, any criminal caught would be executed. Thus, a criminal executed at a young age wouldn't be able to grow up and marry a good man's daughter and give that good man criminal grandchildren. Doing this constantly, over seven hundred and fifty years, culled most criminality from the people of England, France and Germany, thus making them a more kind and less violent people.

In addition, places like England for a long time had systems where smart, competent, capable men could gain wealth over less capable men and thus have more money to support more children than them. Thus, every generation, more people were born to smart men than incapable men. Slowly, smart men started to outnumber unintelligent men. It got to the point where every generation, some smart men's sons would end up marrying the daughters of less capable men making the less capable men's grandchildren smarter and more capable. Thus, everyone in the country slowly got smarter and their lives improved. It is never overpopulation that makes an area bad. It becomes bad if there aren't enough smart capable people to prop up civilization and help stupid people get by.

A woman smart enough to be a doctor, instead of becoming a doctor, could marry a doctor and have many children with him. She could have many sons who could be doctors and daughters who could birth sons who could be doctors. A woman smart enough to be a doctor, instead being a stay at home mother, could be responsible for many dozens of doctors in just a few generations. A woman could be a doctor or the great grandmother of dozens of doctors. Which is more needed in the world? A woman doctor or an abundance of doctors? 

Now, consider that black and brown people didn't go through what white people went through. They are not the same as whites. They are more violent and criminal. If one in ten thousand whites is a violent criminal, then a town of thirty thousand whites has three white violent criminals in it. But if one in twenty non whites is a violent criminal, then a town of thirty thousand non whites has one thousand five hundred violent criminals in it. Thus, a town of sixty thousand whites, with six violent criminals in it, that has whites leave and non whites come in, that ends up as a town of thirty thousand whites and thirty thousand non whites, will go from a town with six violent criminals in it to a town with one thousand five hundred and three violent criminals in it. Think of the difference between walking around a town at night knowing that six violent criminals are out there, versus walking around a town at night knowing that there are one thousand five hundred and three violent criminals out there. With that in mind, why should white people endanger their children by having non whites in their communities? Sure, not all non whites are criminals, but a high enough percentage of them are, thus drastically increasing the amount of criminals you'll come across. What's more important: racial equality or the safety of your children?

So, obviously, the solution to racism would be to put non whites through the same evolutionary process whites went through. We could execute all criminals no matter what race they are, acknowledging the fact that that would be executing more non whites than whites at first, due to whites being less criminal, but also realising it will converge toward equality after some time. And we could let rich non whites thrive and have many kids and let poor non whites struggle to make ends meet with a few kids. Generation after generation non whites would become less criminally inclined and would become smarter and more capable. But white people suggested stuff like this over a hundred years ago, back in the early twentieth century, and the response from the non whites was to decry it as 'racist' and evil. So, from that we can tell non whites don't want to become more capable, competent, intelligent and less violent. They want to stay lazy, stupid and violent. And if that's the way they want to be, then that should be respected. But it should also be respected when whites don't want to be around them anymore.

In conclusion, the meaning of life is to be a good person and find a good person to make children with.